Skip to main content

Finite Element Analysis? Any hints?

While I have taken a course on the Finite Element Method during my "master of engineering: architecture", I have never used this in practice, so it has faded considerably over the years. Since performance simulation and Building Information Modeling go hand in hand, I want to reload some of that knowledge. So I have been looking for some software tools to connect to a digital design workflow.

So far, it is cloudy... but I want to share some of it here.
  1. There are as many approaches as there are engineering problems... structural mechanics, acoustics, heat transfer and energy, ... They all can apply these methods. Most software seems to focus on one approach.
  2. It's a Windows world. Face it, most engineers work on Windows. Some of them use Linux. Most of them ignore Macs. So most engineering software is Windows-only.
  3. Most systems are commercial. Some Open Source systems are really open in the sense that they can be used as libraries to create a custom solution. This takes effort and requires experience and knowledge, which makes it less likely to lead to a finished usable product that even an architect can use.
That said, there are some solutions I'd like to mention here.
  1. OpenFoam: Open Source CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), to be used to solve fluid flows, chemical reactions, turbulence, heat transfer. Linux only.
  2.  JCAE : Java based Computer Aided Engineering, with volumes and finite elements modeler. Based on OpenCASCADE and cross-platform (currently supports Windows and Linux). No analysis, but can be used to prepare a mesh for analysis.
  3. Geometry Gym: a series of modules for Rhino Grasshopper (thus Windows-only) to link Grasshopper with a solver to assist interactive form-finding with engineering analysis.
  4. Karamba : a module for Rhino Grasshopper, where a direct analysis can be linked to an interactive Grasshopper construct. There are real limitations, e.g. rods are fixed to steel, have fixed profile, nodes are fixed etc... This makes it faster, but requires separate analysis if this does not fit your design. Made in collaboration with Bollinger-Grohmann-Schneider.
  5. Load Design : work-in-progress of a FEA software made specifically for OSX. While still a bit rough at the edges, it is already quite complete and usable. Input is text-based, which is not uncommon. Output is graphical, although import- and export are mostly non-existant right now. Free to use while under development.
  6. Salome is an Open Source platofrm for pre- and post-processing numerical simulations. It builds on OpenCASCADE and can be used as standalone software. Focus is on Linux (but binaries for Windows are available). Some parts it have been ported to OSX within the efforts around the Python wrappers for OpenCASCADE.
  7. FEAPpv : personal edition of a FEA toolset, as part of a course book. This is a free and open source edition that can be used for learning. You need a Fortran compiler. Available for Windows and Linux.
  8. Code Aster : series of tools for structural and thermodynamic simulations. Open Source and using Python (but also Tcl/Tk, GMSH). Can be used in combination with Salome.
  9. CAELinux : full Linux distribution packed with engineering tools, including Salome, Code_Aster, OpenFOAM...
Even though, many engineers will still rely on the well-known commercial solutions primarily, e.g.
  • Ansys
  • Scia products
  • BuildSoft products
  • Nastran
  • Abaqus
---- Added Section ---
  • miniFEA : another nice link, with a FEA program running inside a Web Browser (Java or Flash versions are available). This is targeted at education (students, instructors).


  1. Very glad you brought up this topic.

    Windows world - yes, definitely. All the Linux stuff is somewhere at the joint between engineering and proper science, but it fades quickly as you look at more practical tasks.

    Ansys, Abaqus, Nastran are all high-end and super expensive, and they are mostly into MCAD. As for AEC, they are basically either for research applications or for some really complex and innovative structures.

    The mainstream software for engineers is numerous and vendor lock-in is incredible here since the learning curve is usually crappy. Local standards support is crucial for software to get any attention (I'm talking about AEC FEA all the way here) and some sort of certification will likely exist, either in form of recommendations or some real certification like we have here in ex-USSR.
    It is crucial to the extent that me and my team had to lead the certification process (nuclear sector!) for the software we use all by ourselves with very little awareness from the vendor (let's not point fingers but its name begins with "Auto" and ends with "desk").

    The lack of some kind of a community-aware software recognized internationally by most (or at least some) engineers is a major pain.
    I'm drafting some crazy projects all the time to deal with that.

  2. You might have a look at Elmer, see It is a true multiphysics code covering all major application areas, also supports Windows, and is Open Source.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Improve usage of BIM during early design phases

When I was collecting ideas for a book chapter on BIM (that seemed to never have emerged after that), I collected 10 ideas, which I believe still reflect good recommendations to improve the usage of BIM during the early design phases. These ideas are related to BIM software, but you can apply them in any flavor, as long as you can model with Building Elements, Spaces and have control over representation. Introduction This article gives an overview of several recommendations and tips, to better apply BIM applications and BIM methodologies, in the context of the early design phases. Many of these tips are applicable in any BIM application and they are based on experience gathered from teaching, researching and using BIM software. Sometimes they could help software developers to improve the workflow of their particular BIM implementation. Tip 1 : Gradually increase the amount of information In the early design phases, the architect makes assumptions and lays out the main design in

Getting BIM data into Unity (Part 9 - using IfcConvert)

This is part 9 of a series of posts about getting BIM data into Unity. In this post, we’ll discuss the IfcConvert utility from the IfcOpenShell Open Source IFC Library to preprocess an IFC model for integration with Unity. This is (finally?) again a coding post, with some scripts which are shared to build upon. Conversion of IFC into Unity-friendly formats The strategy with this approach is that you preprocess the IFC-file into more manageable formats for Unity integration. Most Web-platforms do some sort of pre-processing anyway, so what you see in your browsers is almost never an IFC-file, but an optimised Mesh-based geometric representation. However, it wouldn’t be BIM-related if we’d limit ourselves to the geometry, so we will parse the model information as well, albeit using another, pre-processed file. IFC to Wavefront OBJ I used a test IFC-model and used the IfcConvert-utility converted it into OBJ en XML formats. The default way to use it is very simple:

Getting BIM data into Unity (Part 8 - Strategies to tackle IFC)

This is part 8 of a series of posts about getting BIM data into Unity. In this post, we’ll discuss IFC as a transfer format towards Unity. As with the previous post, this is not a coding post, although hints and examples are provided. Open BIM and IFC Everybody who ever met me or heard me present on a conference or BIM-lecture will not be surprised to hear that I’m a strong believer in the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), an open standard, with already two versions published as an ISO standard, being IFC2x2 and IFC4 (but surprisingly not IFC2x3 which is widely used). In the ideal world, this would be the format to use to transfer BIM data into another environment, such as Unity. So what are our options? Looking in the Unity Asset Store Assimp is a library which supports multiple formats, including IFC.   I did a few attempts, but alas without any success. It is possib